TOP GUIDELINES OF CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE LAW

Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law

Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law

Blog Article

These provisions implement to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even when the transaction occurred just before its promulgation. Read more

The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more

Should the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and progress according to the regulation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Generally speaking, higher courts never have direct oversight over the decreased courts of record, in that they cannot get to out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments in the reduced courts.

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised on the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Harmless with him in their home. The therapist assured them that that they had nothing at all to worry about.

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it really is practical for a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to produce an attempt to get rid of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's achieved to more info a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's achieved such stage. Read more

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, it is also a well-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.

Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It can be perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. As a result, this petition is admissible based on founded court precedents, along with the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more

The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere into a tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision as well as the statutes.[four]

8. With the reasons stated higher than, this court finds the petition being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend inside the comments, and their request is thus acceded to. All pending applications, if any, are also dismissed. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners may possibly look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Report this page